Aller directement au menu principal Aller directement au contenu principal Aller au pied de page

Vol. 46 No 1 (2026)
Revista Portuguesa de Psicanálise

Fundamentos

Les étates non represésentés et la nécessité d'une psychanalyse trasnfromationnelle

https://doi.org/10.51356/rpp.461a1

Publiée 2026-07-22

Marcelo Gomes
American Psychoanalytic Association

Résumé

Gadinni (1984) et Bolognini (2020) ont souligné que les manifestations psychopathologiques ont considérablement évolué depuis l'époque de Freud. Les deux auteurs indiquent que les états borderline et narcissiques font partie des changements observés dans les manifestations psychopathologiques contemporaines. Ces changements n'ont pas modifié la méthode ou le processus de la psychanalyse, mais ont continué à pousser le travail analytique au-delà des éléments refoulés de l'inconscient vers un niveau plus profond qui met l'accent sur la transformation d'états non représentés et, par conséquent, davantage sur la création d'une structure psychique que sur l'accès au contenu refoulé. Le processus transformationnel met l'accent sur le travail avec le patient pour créer de nouvelles structures psychiques dans des domaines caractérisés par des vides, renforcer les structures psychiques faibles qui contribuent aux distorsions et permettre à l'appareil psychique de fonctionner de manière plus organisée. Cet article vise à explorer le concept de psychanalyse transformationnelle comme approche pour travailler avec des états non névrotiques dans un contexte analytique postmoderne, en revisitant l'idée de représentation de Freud et en discutant les perspectives freudiennes contemporaines sur les états non représentés à l'aide d'un cas clinique. En outre, l'article propose que, pour se concentrer sur un mode plus transformationnel, l'analyste doit fonctionner comme « l'Autre opératif », tel qu'articulé par Freud dans son expression « wirksamen anderen » (1916), suivi d'un cas clinique.

 

 

Mots-clés

Psychanalyse transformationnelle, États non représentés, Autre opératif

PDF (Português)

Biographie de l'auteur

Marcelo Gomes

Dr. Marcelo Gomes é psicanalista em Nova York, NY. Ele é Diretor do programa de pós-graduação em psicanálise do Blanton-Peale Graduate Institute em Manhatan onde também atua como supervisor clínico na clínica do instituto. Ele é membro American Psychoanalytic Association, um componente da IPA e da British Association for Training and Psychotherapy. Ele é Doutor em religião pela Universidade de Boston e PhD em ciências da psicoterapia pela Universidade Sigmund Freud em Viena, Áustria. Dr. Marcelo Gomes tem 20 anos de experiência clínica e é licenciado nos estados de NY, NJ, Vermont e também psicoterapeuta registrado no Reino Unido. 

Références

  1. Bion, W. R. (1962). Learning from experience. Heinemann.
  2. Bion, W. R. (1963). Elements of psycho-analysis. Heinemann.
  3. Bion, W. R. (1965). Transformations: Change from learning to growth. Heinemann.
  4. Bolognini, S. (2023). New forms of psychopathology in a changing world: A challenge for psychoanalysis in the twenty-first century. In F. Busch (Ed.), Psychoanalysis at the crossroads: An international perspective (1.ª ed., pp. 65-79). Routledge.
  5. Botella, C., & Botella, S. (2005). The work of psychic figurability. Routledge.
  6. Civitarese, G. (2008). Immersion and the analytic field. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 89(2), 279-298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-8315.2008.00019.x
  7. Dias, G. (2022). Song of exile. In J. A. Enslen, Song of exile: A cultural history of Brazil’s most popular poem, 1846–2018 (pp. 4-5). Purdue University Press.
  8. Ferro, A. (1999). The bi-personal field: Experiences in child analysis. Routledge.
  9. Freud, S. (1953). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 18, pp. 65-143). Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1921)
  10. Freud, S. (1953). On aphasia: A critical study (E. Stengel, Trans.). International Universities Press. (Original work published 1891)
  11. Freud, S. (1957). The unconscious. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14, pp. 159-215). Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1915)
  12. Freud, S. (1957). Some character-types met with in psycho-analytic work. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14, pp. 309-333). Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1916)
  13. Freud, S. (1959). Obsessive actions and religious practices. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 9, pp. 115-127). Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1907)
  14. Freud, S. (1964). Constructions in analysis. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 23, pp. 257-269). Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1937)
  15. Gaddini, E. (1984). Se e come sono cambiati i nostri pazienti fino ai nostri giorni. Rivista di Psicoanalisi, 30, 560-580.
  16. Gomes, M. (2023a). Liquid modernity and imagistic production: Reflections on social media and free associations. The Psychoanalytic Review, 110(3), 293-314. https://doi.org/10.1521/prev.2023.110.3.287
  17. Gomes, M. (2023b). Projective identification, empathy, and the analytic work. Imágo Budapest, 2023(4), 101-113.
  18. Green, A. (1975). The analyst, symbolization and absence in the analytic setting (On changes in analytic practice and analytic experience). The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 56(1), 1-22.
  19. Green, A. (1977). On private madness. Karnac Books.
  20. Green, A. (1999). The fabric of affect in the psychoanalytic discourse. Routledge.
  21. Heimann, P. (1950). On counter-transference. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 31, 81-84.
  22. Klein, M. (1946). Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 27, 99-110.
  23. Levine, H. (2021). Minding the gap: Psychoanalysis and the unrepresented. Romanian Journal of Psychoanalysis, 14(2), 97–112. 10.2478/rjp2021-0021
  24. Levine, H. (2022). Affect, representation, and language: Between the silence and the cry. Routledge.
  25. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. University of Chicago Press.
  26. Ogden, T. H. (1994). The analytic third: Working with intersubjective clinical facts. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75(1), 3-19.
  27. Ogden, T. H. (2008). Bion’s four principles of mental functioning. Fort Da, 14, 11-35.
  28. Racker, H. (1968). Transference and countertransference. International Universities Press. Routledge/Karnac Books.
  29. Rolland, J.-C. (1998). Guérir du mal d’aimer. Gallimard.
  30. Rocha Barros, E. (2018, 30 maio-3 junho). Symbol formation and transformation in theory and practice [Apresentação oral]. Meetings of the Canadian Psychoanalytic Association, Montreal, Canadá.
  31. Roussillon, R. (2014, 30 junho). Remarks made during a panel discussion at the 74th French Language Congress (CPLF), Montreal, Canadá.
  32. Segal, H. (1974). Introduction to the work of Melanie Klein (2nd ed.). Basic Books.
  33. Sparer, E. A. (2010). The French model at work: Indication and the Jean Favreau Centre for Consultation and Treatment. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 91, 1179–1199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17458315.2010.00288.x
  34. Urribarri, F. (2012). The logic of the living: The work of André Green. Karnac Books.