A psicanálise e a terceira posição: convulsões sociais e atrocidade
Abstract
Psychoanalysis and the third position: social upheavals and atrocity
Many situations are now characterized by breakdown of order and structure leaving people at the peril of unorganized forces (war-machines, human traffickers etc.) with dehumanizing of ordinary people on a mass-scale as consequence, especially in the refugee field. The paper focuses how alienating discourses on “trauma” and societies neglect of traumatized people increases suffering and have grave consequences for coming generations. It is reflected on which ways psychoanalysis may represent a mediating function in relation to regressive processes on individual, group, and societal levels. A conceptualization of a third position from which psychoanalysis can work is developed. The third position is seen as inevitable in psychoanalytic clinical work in that symbolization and working though must be anchored in a common cultural discourse. A model for rethinking traumatization is proposed that develops the conception of the third position in relations to a broader filed and encompasses the subject’s relations in a dyadic, bodily-affective relations, in relations to the group and family, and in relation to culture and discourse. This model may lay ground for an understanding of how atrocities, social catastrophes like collective traumatization can be worked through on individual and social levels. Clinical examples are presented to illuminate these processes.
Keywords
traumatization, third, body, group, speech
Author Biography
Sverre Varvin
Psiquiatra, Psicanalista didata da Sociedade Psicanalítica Norueguesa, Professor emérito na Universidade de Oslo, pela qual se doutorou com a tese intitulada Mental survival strategies after extreme traumatisation.Vencedor do The Sigourney Award, que reconhece contribuições significativas para o campo da Psicanálise.
References
- Alayarian, A. (2007). Resilience, suffering and creativity. Karnac Books.
- Askevold, F. (1980). The war sailor syndrome. Danish Medical Bulletin, 27, 220–224.
- Bion,W. R. (1952). Group dynamics: A re-view. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 33, 235–247.
- Bion,W. R. (1962). Learning from experience. Heinemann.
- Bohleber, W. (2002). Kollektive phantasmen, destruktivität und terrorismus. Psyche, 56, 699–720.
- Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press.
- Bühler, K. (1934). Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena, Gustav Fischer Verlag.
- Eitinger, L. (1965). Concentration camp survivors in Norway and Israel. Israel Journal of Medical Science, 1, 883–895.
- Eitinger, L. (1969). Psychosomatic problems in concentration camp survivors. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 13, 183–189.
- Eitinger, L. (1971). Organic and psychosomatic aftereffects of concentration camp imprisonment. International Psychiatry Clinic, 8, 205–215.
- Freud, S. (1939). Der Mann Moses und die Monotheistischen Religion: Drei Abhandlungen. S. Fischer Verlag.
- Freud, S. (1949). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. Em James Strachey (Ed.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. 6. The Hogarth Press. (Original publicado em 1921.)
- Freud, S. (1949). Civilization and its Discontents. Em James Strachey (Ed.),The Standard Edition of the Complete PsychologicalWorks of Sigmund Freud, vol. 17. The Hogarth Press. (Original publicado em 1930.)
- Freud, S. (1949). Why war? Em James Strachey (Ed.), The Standard Edition of the Complete PsychologicalWorks of Sigmund Freud, vol 22, (pp. 197–215). The Hogarth Press. (Original publicado em 1933.)
- Green, A. (2004). Thirdness and psychoanalytic concepts. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73, 99–135.
- Hauser, S. (1999). Understanding resilient outcomes: Adolescent lives across time and generations. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 9, 1–24.
- Hauser, S., Allen, J. & Golden, E. (2006). Out of the woods. Tales of resilient teens. Harvard University Press.
- Hoppe, K. (1968). Re-somatization of affects in survivors of persecution. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 49, 324–326.
- Hopper, E. (2002). The social unconscious: Selected papers. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
- Keilson, H. & Sarpathie, R. (1979). Sequentieller Traumatisierung bei Kindern. Ferdinand Enke.
- Kernberg, O. F. (1997). The nature of interpretation: Intersubjectivity and the third position. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 57, 297–312.
- Kinston, W. & Cohen, J. (1986). Primal repression: Clinical and theoretical aspects. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 67, 235–242.
- Larsen, E. D. & Rosenbaum, B., Nachträglichkeit and psychoanalytic creativity. Scandinavian Review of Psychoanalysis. No prelo.
- Laub, D. (2000). Testimonies in the treatment of genocidal trauma. Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 81(4), 351–359.
- Laub, D. & Podell, D. (1995). Art and trauma. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 76, 991–1005.
- Levine H. (2021). Trauma, process and representation. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 102, 794–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207578.2020.1841923
- Levine, H., Reed, G. & Scarfone, D. (2013). Unrepresented states and the construction of meaning: Clinical and theoretical contributions. Karnac Books.
- Mitscherlich, A. & Mitscherlich, M. (1967). Die Unfähigkeit zuTrauern:Grundlagen Kollektiven Verhaltens. Piper.
- Muller, J. P. (1999). Consultation from the third position. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 59, 113–118.
- Muller, J. P. (2007). A view From Riggs: Treatment resistance and patient authority–IV: Why the pair needs the third. Journal of The American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry, 35, 221–241.
- Ogden, T. (1989). On the concept of an autistic- contiguous position. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 70, 127–140.
- Ogden,T. (1994).The analytic third:Working with intersubjective clinical facts. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75, 3–19.
- Peirce, C. S. (1984). Writings of Charles S Peirce. A chronological edition (vol. 2). Indiana University Press.
- Riesenberg-Malcolm, R. (2004). Bedeutsames Vergessen: Eine klinische Untersuchung. Jahrbuch der Psychoanalyse, 48, 9–26.
- Rosenbaum, B. & Varvin, S. (2007). The influence of extreme traumatisation on body, mind and social relations. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 88, 1527–1542.
- Schore, A. (2003). Affect dysregulation & disorders of the self. W.W. Norton & Company.
- Ungar, M. (2008). Resilience across cultures. British Journal of SocialWork, 38, 218–235.
- Ungar, M. (2012). The social ecology of resilience. A handbook of theory and practice. Springer Verlag.
- UNHCR. (2022). UNHCR Refugee agency [Online]. https://www.unhcr.org. [Consultado em 27.06.2022.]
- Varvin, S. (2017). Our relations to refugees: Between compassion and dehumanization. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 77, 1–19.
- Varvin, S. (2019). Psychoanalysis and the situation of refugees: A human rights perspective. Em P. Montagna & A. Harris (Eds.), Psychoanalysis, Law, and Society (pp. 9-26). Routledge.
- Varvin, S. & Rosenbaum, B. (2011). Severely traumatized patients’ attempts at reorganizing their relations to others in psychotherapy: An enunciation analysis. Em N. Freedman, M. Hurvich & R.Ward (Eds.), Another kind of evidence. Studies on Internalization, Annihilation Anxiety, and Progressive Symbolization in the Psychoanalytic Process. (pp. 222–238). Karnac Books.
- Volkan,V. (1997). Bloodlines. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
- Zwiebel, R. (2004). The third position: Reflections about the internal analytic working process. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73(1), 215–265. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2167-4086.2004.tb00158.x